Blog

Corporate Identity & Naming Lessons From The Fortune 500

The evolution in the names of Fortune 500 corporate identity provides instructive insights for the branding of companies and for understanding identity effectiveness in our new economy.

The names of Fortune 500 companies can be defined by five categories*: Descriptive names, Family names, Image names, Coined names and Initial names – all of which have changed significantly over the past 55 years. (See footnote for definitions*)
naming lessons

From 1954 to 2009, the Fortune 500 had:
54% decrease in Descriptive
45% decrease in Family
14% increase in Initials
45% increase in Image
213% increase in Coined

There has been a significant shift away from names that emphasize the companies’ location, geographic market or specific product – toward names that convey no location, market or product. We believe this is because it is difficult for a company to grow big enough to be on the Fortune 500 if a company has a limited product or market, or if the company’s name or identity creates perceptions that the company has limited scope or reach. To illustrate this, the revenue required for a company to qualify for listing on the Fortune 500 has increased dramatically.

For example:
• Copperweld Steel was #500 on the 1954 Fortune 500 with sales of $49 Million, whereas Blockbuster was #500 on the 2009 Fortune 500 with sales of $4 Billion. Blockbuster’s 2009 sales would have made Blockbuster #3 on the 1954 Fortune 500 – after General Motors and Standard Oil of N.J. and ahead of U.S. Steel.

• General Motors was # 1 on the 1954 Fortune 500 with sales of $9.8 Billion, whereas Wal-Mart is #1 on the 2009 Fortune 500 with sales of $408 Billion.

• Wal-Mart’s 2009 sales of $408 Billion are three times the TOTAL sales of ALL the companies on the 1954 Fortune 500, i.e $137 Billion.

Although there has been a 45% decrease in family names, about 25% of the 2009 Fortune 500 still have family names that have acquired appropriate meaning over time and that have proven to be unique, effective, protectable and lasting corporate identities and brands.Almost one-half of the companies in the 1954 Fortune 500 had family names. These names gave one a clear impression of who these companies were, what they did and where they did it. Many family names from the 1954 list, that are no longer on the Fortune 500, gave a strong sense that there were real individuals who stood behind the company and were responsible for its actions.As companies grow and expand, they need corporate names that are not specifically descriptive or restrictive, that appeal to broader markets, and that are unique and protectable. This has led companies to shift to image names, coined names and initials names. Almost one-half the 2009 Fortune 500 have coined, image or initials names. Many of these names leave one wondering who these companies are, what they do and where they do it. These names convey no commitment to any community, product, service or by any individuals. While these kinds of names are hard to relate to, they avoid restricting companies and are more easily protectable. Because they lack intrinsic meaning, they require huge investments to build beneficial meaning or to achieve any emotional connection.
Insights
Descriptive names – should not limit the company product or market, unless that product has the potential for broad, long-term growth, (technology, communications, energy, finance, etc.) Identifying with a specific city or region can become a barrier to real or perceived growth and expansion.

Family names – can become distinctive and protectable corporate identities and brands, and they can acquire relevant meaning over time, but they require significant investment.

Image names – can be distinctive and protectable and are most effective when they convey qualities that benefit customers or when they are positioned advantageously vs. competitors.

Coined names – should be more than unique, protectable and meaningless. They should provide some memorable, derivative or appropriate context, e.g. FedEx, Alcoa, Xerox, Google.

Initials names – are the weakest solution to corporate naming opportunities. The best known (IBM, AT&T, GE, etc) have spent billions on marketing and communication over many decades. Without that kind of investment and time, most initials names will be relegated to obscurity.

As companies diversify and grow, they need names that don’t restrict growth or opportunity, but names that people can relate to, believe in, care about, take pride in and become loyal to.
Download the entire White Paper

Definitions
• Descriptive – describe a company in terms of a specific product and/or geography
• Family – are when a family name is used as a company’s primary name
• Image – are real words that convey certain qualities, characteristics or imagery
• Coined – are made-up words, or unique combinations of real words that create a name
• Initials – are when initials are used instead of words as the primary company name

**Note: 1954 sales numbers have not been adjusted for inflation. The criteria for listing on the Fortune 500 have become more inclusive since 1954’s focus on “industrial companies” only.

Report by Marshall Strategy.

0
0

Forecast: Cloudy Days Ahead

As discussed in this recent article that appeared in The New York Times, companies the world over, large and small, are waking up to cloud computing. It’s one of the most referenced – and recognized – terms in business today.

Brands and their audiences are taking notice. You’d have to be living off the grid entirely to miss Microsoft’s advertising blitz, bringing the cloud to businesses and consumers in ways that increase information availability and computing power, reduce cost, and generally make life more convenient.  With brands like Azure, Microsoft’s enterprise cloud computing platform, Cloud Drive from Amazon, and Sales Cloud and Service Cloud from Salesforce, we’re seeing a frenzy of meteorologically-themed branding that could soon rival the “e” naming craze of the late 1990s.

The challenge for tech companies, from a naming point of view, is to be a part of the buzz without relying too heavily on the buzzword. “Cloud” is currently a buzzword – like “branding”, or “innovation,” “e-“ or “dot.com” have been before it. In today’s rapidly paced market, what was once “new” will become table stakes in a very short time. The key is to position your company and products in a way that is familiar, meaningful and appealing to your customers in the near future, but also unique, differentiating and sustainable over the long term.

Read The New York Times article.

0
0

Social Media Enhances Corporate Branding Strategies

A recent report found a correlation between brands going the extra mile to engage customers and their financial performance: The deeper the engagement, the better the results. That points to brand consultants having to consider more factors than ever regarding what impacts a company’s brand, including new technologies and trends, as well as staying on the edge of innovation. It’s more than just asking the eternal Shakespearean question, “What’s in a name?”

0
0